Menu
logologo
Psychological ImpactsLegal IssuesBlogContact
logologo
  • Psychological Impacts
  • Legal Issues
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Purpose
    • Puberty Blockers and Gender Dysphoria
    • Legal Issues
  • Institutions
    • Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine
    • Council for Choices in Health Care
    • National Health Service
  • Health Impacts
    • Health Impacts
    • Expert Statements on Puberty Blockers
    • Pyschological Impacts
    • Bone Health
    • Fertility
  • Medical Literature
    • Overview of the medical literature on puberty blockers
    • Intervention Studies
      • Achille et al, 2020
      • van der Miesen et al, 2020
      • Burke et al, 2016
      • Carmichael, 2015
      • Costa et al, 2015
      • Staphorsius et al, 2015
      • Vries et al, 2014
      • Vries et al, 2011
    • Case Studies
      • Schneider et al, 2017
    • Animal Studies
      • Hough et al, 2017
    • Analysis
      • Biggs, 2020
      • Pilgrim and Entwistle, 2020
      • Turban et al, 2020
      • Chew et al, 2018
  • Psychotherapy
    • Kozlowska et al, 2021
    • Churcher Clarke and Spilliadis, 2019
  • Guidelines
    • New Zealand Guidelines
  • Documentaries
    • Dysphoric
    • The Trans Train
  • Media & Resources
    • Resources
    • BBC
    • British Medical Journal
    • Chicago Tribune
    • National Post
    • Newsweek
    • Radio New Zealand
    • Sydney Morning Herald
    • The Economist
    • The Spectator
    • The Times

British Medical Journal

Hormone blockers: Judges assess whether children should be treated#

9 October 2020 - Clare Dyer

Gender-affirming hormone in children and adolescents#

BMJ EBM Spotlight - 25 February 2019 - Carl Heneghan and Tom Jefferson

Previous
« BBC
Next
Chicago Tribune »
  • Hormone blockers: Judges assess whether children should be treated
  • Gender-affirming hormone in children and adolescents

Connect

  • Blog
  • @fullyinformednz
  • Disclaimer